One must have heard innumerable discussions on this very topic and most of us feel that here judgement falls undoubtedly in favour of vegetarianism. Arguments such as an individual's freedom to live and grow, ecological disbalance and inability to regain the lost animals come to rescue vegetarianism. Lets have a look from a diffrent dimension.
If living right activist talk about the pain and sufferings of animals, how can they oversee the same caused when fruits, cereals, leaves are torn off from a plant's body. It has been well established that plants too feel pain as animals do. If living right activists fight for animal life then why not for plants and make humans starve to death????
The truth, though bitter , is that we donot have a hold on these natural processes. Nature has created a cycle called food chain that takes care of the ecological balance that we humans are striving hard for . The very fact that our digestive system has the ability to digest meat is itself nature's consent to humans to be non vegetarians.
Some may argue that killing of birds and animals for meat has caused a disbalance in natural ecosystems and is gradually disturbing the food chain. But i don't get it how do poultry farms that intentionally make chickens breed in large numbers and make them available for meat disturb the environment . Let me make a point clear i'm focusing on non veg food and not justifying the killing of animals like kaziranga rhinos for their horns .
A very well known rule of nature 'survival of the fittest'; as every other intelligent species who rules over species inferior to him, man too has the right to indulge in actions that do not disturb the ecology to a state that would harm him . I am not against vegetarianism. In fact i do respect individual ideas of an individual but what i have to say is b'ing non vegetarian is not a crime!!!!
